Olaf Pieczkowski vs Edward Winter Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 13 Jul at 05:30 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
O. Pieczkowski vs E. Winter

POL
1
Win
Played
1
Win

AUS
1
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Pieczkowski 1 - 1 Winter
They have played 5 sets in total, with Olaf Pieczkowski winning 2 and Edward Winter winning 3. The last match between Edward Winter and Olaf Pieczkowski was at the Pozoblanco Challenger, 13-07-2025, Round: Q1, Surface: Hard, with Edward Winter getting the victory 7-6(3) 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Pieczkowski | 1 |
| Winter | 1 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(Q1) Pozoblanco Challenger(07-13-25)
(R1) M25 Elvas(06-24-25)
O. Pieczkowski vs E. Winter H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $118,500 |
| 56.89% (128-97) | Career Total W/L | 58.05% (101-73) |
| 1 | Hard | 1 |
| 3 | Titles | 3 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0.00% (0-2) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
O. Pieczkowski vs E. Winter Match Preview:
- Both players have comparable second serve performance, with Winter at 44.86% and Pieczkowski slightly behind at 43.42%. Could this give Winter a slight edge?
- When it comes to returning the opponent's second serve, Pieczkowski is stronger, winning 49.58% of the points compared to Winter’s 45.98%.
- Winter performs better at returning first serves, with a success rate of 31.62% compared to Pieczkowski's 23.89%.
- Under pressure, Winter excels in saving breakpoints, achieving a rate of 61.23%, whereas Pieczkowski saves 50.78%.
- Pieczkowski displays a higher match win percentage over the last year at 62.69%, contrasted with Winter's 53.7%.
- Both players have their best surface performance on indoor hard courts, but Pieczkowski shows a slightly higher win percentage at 63% versus Winter’s 60%.
- In head-to-head encounters, Pieczkowski leads, having won their single match against Winter and also prevailing in more sets.
- The players tend to engage in lengthy matches, averaging 2 hours and 15 minutes, but Pieczkowski has the edge in deciding set scenarios.
- Winter has faced slightly lower-ranked opponents on average than Pieczkowski, who has contended with higher-ranked competitors.
- Winter converts fewer breakpoints (30.3%) compared to Pieczkowski’s 35.71%, a key stat in pressure situations.
Editorial Prediction (July 13, 2025, UTC):
As Winter and Pieczkowski prepare for their upcoming match, an analysis of their recent form reveals intriguing contrasts in performance.
Pieczkowski displays superior skills in critical aspects, such as breaking the opponent’s serve and prevailing in deciding sets. Their higher match win percentage and better record in previous encounters with Winter further bolster their prospects.
While Winter shows resilience under pressure by saving a higher percentage of breakpoints, this may not be enough to counter Pieczkowski's stronger conversion rates and performance against higher-ranked opponents.
Based on the current statistics and recent trends, Pieczkowski appears to have the upper hand and is likely to triumph in the upcoming clash.
Olaf Pieczkowski vs Edward Winter Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
O. Pieczkowski vs E. Winter H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 3 |
| 25 | Games Won | 26 |
| 6 | Aces (Total) | 6 |
| 11 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 2:7:22 | Average Match Time | 2:7:22 |
| 59% (94/160) | 1st Serve % | 61% (95/157) |
| 67% (63/94) | 1st Serve Win % | 76% (72/95) |
| 50% (33/66) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (27/62) |
| 30% (6/20) | Break Pts Won % | 40% (6/15) |
| 37% (58/157) | Return Points Win % | 40% (64/160) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
O. Pieczkowski Recent Matches Played
E. Winter Recent Matches Played

O. Pieczkowski vs E. Winter Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56.89% (128/97) | YTD Win/Loss | 58.05% (101/73) |
| 56.04% (283/222) | Sets Win/Loss | 57.84% (225/164) |
| 51.91% (2394/2218) | Games Win/Loss | 54.15% (1972/1670) |
| 56.93% (78/59) | Hard Win/Loss | 59.21% (90/62) |
| 57.14% (40/30) | Clay Win/Loss | 57.14% (4/3) |
| 55.56% (10/8) | Indoor Hard W/L | 37.50% (3/5) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 57.14% (4/3) |
| 0.26 | Aces Per Game | 0.18 |
| 581 | Aces Total | 312 |
| 0.31 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.27 |
| 697 | Total Double Faults | 478 |
| 1:37:47 | Average Match Time | 1:38:40 |
| 462.87 | Average Opponent Rank | 408.48 |
| 61% (8182/13446) | 1st Serve % | 65% (7004/10746) |
| 68% (5528/8182) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (4730/7004) |
| 48% (2507/5263) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (1894/3742) |
| 45% (657/1447) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (503/1213) |
| 41% (5600/13501) | Return Points Win % | 41% (4472/10779) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 33.33% (2/4) |
| 60.00% (3/2) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/3) |
| 45.24% (19/23) | Challenger W/L | 51.16% (22/21) |
| 59.55% (106/72) | Futures W/L | 63.11% (77/45) |
| 57% (125/221) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (100/173) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 55% (30/55) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (28/52) |
| 48% (29/60) | Deciding Set Win % | 43% (17/40) |
| 86% (131/113) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (105/89) |
| 13% (131/17) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (105/16) |
| 15% (93/14) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (69/12) |